Ficha de relación
Chile
Perú
Evaluación de la relación
Las explicaciones registradas están disponibles actualmente en inglés.
Chile and Peru combine practical cooperation and peaceful dispute resolution with historical rivalry and periodic tensions.
Chile hacia Perú
+25Chile participated in the International Court of Justice proceedings over the maritime boundary with Peru and implemented the Court’s 2014 ruling, resolving a major bilateral dispute. Chile has also pursued practical cooperation with Peru, though past espionage allegations have strained confidence.
Perú hacia Chile
+25Peru brought its maritime-boundary dispute with Chile to the International Court of Justice and accepted the Court’s 2014 ruling, resolving the issue through peaceful legal means. Peru has also engaged in practical cooperation with Chile, while past espionage allegations have contributed to bilateral tension.
Relación general
+25The relationship combines the peaceful legal settlement of a major maritime dispute with practical cooperation and a history of rivalry and episodic mistrust. The 2014 International Court of Justice ruling was an important stabilizing development, but past espionage allegations illustrate the persistence of tensions.
Cómo interpretar estas puntuaciones
Las puntuaciones son valoraciones aproximadas, no mediciones objetivas ni una verificación actual. Las puntuaciones direccionales describen políticas y actuaciones gubernamentales, no la opinión pública. La puntuación general es una estimación independiente, nunca un promedio.
- −100
- Hostilidad extrema y sostenida
- −50
- Considerablemente adversa
- 0
- Mixta o neutral, respaldada por información
- +50
- Considerablemente cooperativa
- +100
- Asociación excepcionalmente estrecha y sostenida
«Sin evaluar» significa que no hay una puntuación registrada. La existencia de una pareja no implica reconocimiento diplomático ni relaciones establecidas.
Contexto de la relación
Panorama general
Chile and Peru have a relationship shaped by historical rivalry and periodic disputes, alongside practical cooperation and peaceful resolution of major disagreements. The International Court of Justice’s 2014 maritime-boundary ruling settled a central dispute, and both governments accepted its outcome. Their relationship remains cooperative in some areas but is not free of tension, including past espionage allegations.
Áreas de tensión
- The maritime boundary dispute, resolved by the International Court of Justice in 2014.
- Espionage allegations that strained bilateral confidence.
Acontecimientos clave
The International Court of Justice issued its judgment on the maritime-boundary dispute between Chile and Peru; both governments accepted the ruling.
Principales incertidumbres
- The extent and implementation of current bilateral cooperation are unclear.
- The present status of confidence-building measures addressing past espionage concerns is unclear.