Relationship dossier

Brazil Mexico

Relationship assessment

A strategic partnership with economic cooperation and recurring policy friction

Brazil toward Mexico

+35

Brazil has pursued bilateral economic cooperation with Mexico through ACE 53 and participates in a strategic partnership framework with the Mexican government. The scope of practical cooperation under these arrangements is unclear.

Mexico toward Brazil

+25

Mexico has pursued bilateral economic cooperation with Brazil through ACE 53 and participates in a strategic partnership framework with the Brazilian government. Mexico’s 2022 reintroduction of visa requirements for Brazilian visitors added friction to people-to-people travel.

Overall relationship

+30

The bilateral relationship has enduring institutional and economic cooperation through a strategic partnership and ACE 53, alongside limits to economic integration and friction over travel requirements. These features support a generally cooperative relationship that is not a close or comprehensive partnership.

How to read these scores

Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.

−100
Extreme sustained hostility
−50
Substantially adversarial
0
Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
+50
Substantially cooperative
+100
Exceptionally close sustained partnership

“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.

Relationship context

Knowledge coverageLimited

Overview

Brazil and Mexico maintain a strategic partnership and have pursued bilateral economic cooperation through the Economic Complementation Agreement (ACE 53). Their relationship also includes recurring policy friction, notably Mexico’s 2022 reintroduction of visa requirements for Brazilian visitors. Cooperation is meaningful but has not produced broad economic integration, and the scope and implementation of bilateral initiatives are unclear.

Areas of tension

Key developments

Major uncertainties

Choose another pair