Relationship dossier
Denmark
Morocco
Relationship assessment
Diplomatic ties shaped by cooperation and a recurring disagreement over Western Sahara
Denmark toward Morocco
-5The Danish government supports a United Nations-led process on Western Sahara’s status rather than recognizing Moroccan sovereignty over the territory.
Morocco toward Denmark
-15In 2016, Morocco recalled its ambassador from Denmark in response to a Danish parliamentary motion concerning recognition of Western Sahara.
Overall relationship
-5The relationship retains diplomatic ties, while disagreement over Western Sahara has produced a concrete diplomatic setback. The extent of cooperation beyond that issue is unclear.
How to read these scores
Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.
- −100
- Extreme sustained hostility
- −50
- Substantially adversarial
- 0
- Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
- +50
- Substantially cooperative
- +100
- Exceptionally close sustained partnership
“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.
Relationship context
Overview
Denmark and Morocco maintain diplomatic relations, but Western Sahara has been a source of tension. Denmark supports a United Nations-led process to resolve the territory’s status, while Morocco regards it as part of its national territory. Morocco recalled its ambassador from Denmark in 2016 after a Danish parliamentary motion concerning recognition of Western Sahara.
Areas of tension
- Western Sahara’s status and Morocco’s claim to the territory
Key developments
Morocco recalled its ambassador from Denmark following a Danish parliamentary motion concerning recognition of Western Sahara.
Major uncertainties
- The extent of subsequent high-level bilateral cooperation is unclear.
- The current scope and implementation of bilateral agreements are unclear.