Relationship dossier

Iceland Kingdom of the Netherlands

Relationship assessment

NATO and EEA cooperation alongside a major Icesave dispute

Iceland toward Kingdom of the Netherlands

+10

Iceland cooperates with the Netherlands through NATO and the European Economic Area. During the Icesave dispute, Iceland rejected repayment arrangements that would have compensated Dutch depositors in failed Icelandic banks, contributing to bilateral friction.

Kingdom of the Netherlands toward Iceland

+10

The Netherlands cooperates with Iceland through NATO and the European Economic Area. It pursued repayment arrangements for Dutch depositors affected by the Icesave failure and brought the dispute before the EFTA Court.

Overall relationship

+15

The relationship rests on sustained cooperation through NATO and the European Economic Area, but the Icesave dispute exposed a substantial disagreement over Iceland's obligations to Dutch depositors. The court resolution helped contain that dispute, while the available facts support a mixed but cooperative overall relationship.

How to read these scores

Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.

−100
Extreme sustained hostility
−50
Substantially adversarial
0
Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
+50
Substantially cooperative
+100
Exceptionally close sustained partnership

“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.

Relationship context

Knowledge coverageLimited

Overview

Iceland and the Netherlands cooperate within NATO and the European Economic Area, while the Icesave dispute brought a significant period of bilateral friction. Iceland rejected repayment arrangements sought by the Netherlands and the United Kingdom for Dutch depositors in failed Icelandic banks; the dispute was ultimately addressed through legal proceedings. The relationship combines enduring institutional cooperation with a notable financial disagreement.

Areas of tension

Key developments

Major uncertainties

Choose another pair