Relationship dossier
Jordan
Kyrgyzstan
Relationship assessment
Jordan and Kyrgyzstan maintain modest cooperation through high-level engagement and bilateral agreements.
Jordan toward Kyrgyzstan
+15Jordan has engaged Kyrgyzstan through high-level bilateral meetings and agreements covering areas including economic, cultural, educational, and legal cooperation.
Kyrgyzstan toward Jordan
+15Kyrgyzstan has engaged Jordan through high-level bilateral meetings and agreements covering areas including economic, cultural, educational, and legal cooperation.
Overall relationship
+15The relationship is characterized by diplomatic engagement and agreements spanning several fields, with no major sustained bilateral confrontation apparent. The limited breadth of known cooperation supports a modest rather than close partnership.
How to read these scores
Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.
- −100
- Extreme sustained hostility
- −50
- Substantially adversarial
- 0
- Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
- +50
- Substantially cooperative
- +100
- Exceptionally close sustained partnership
“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.
Relationship context
Overview
Jordan and Kyrgyzstan have pursued modest bilateral cooperation, including high-level engagement and agreements on areas such as economic, cultural, educational, and legal cooperation. The relationship appears cooperative, but the scope and implementation of these arrangements are unclear.
Key developments
Jordan and Kyrgyzstan pursued high-level engagement and signed bilateral agreements covering multiple areas of cooperation during Kyrgyz President Almazbek Atambayev's visit to Jordan.
Major uncertainties
- The scope and implementation of bilateral cooperation agreements are unclear.
- The continuity and frequency of high-level bilateral engagement are uncertain.