Relationship dossier

Jordan Libya

Relationship assessment

Jordanian support for eastern Libyan forces has strained ties, while a 2014 prisoner exchange demonstrated limited bilateral negotiation.

Jordan toward Libya

-20

Jordan supported eastern Libyan forces led by Khalifa Haftar during Libya's conflict, a policy that aligned Jordan with one side of the country's political and military division.

Libya toward Jordan

+5

Libyan authorities participated in negotiations connected to the 2014 release of Jordan's ambassador, which followed an agreement concerning the transfer of a Libyan prisoner held in Jordan. The episode combined bilateral negotiation with a serious security crisis.

Overall relationship

-5

The relationship has been shaped by Jordan's alignment with eastern Libyan forces and by Libya's prolonged political division. Negotiations around the 2014 ambassador hostage crisis show that bilateral engagement continued, but the known record suggests a relationship marked more by political strain and episodic engagement than by a broad, durable partnership.

How to read these scores

Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.

−100
Extreme sustained hostility
−50
Substantially adversarial
0
Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
+50
Substantially cooperative
+100
Exceptionally close sustained partnership

“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.

Relationship context

Knowledge coverageLimited

Overview

Jordan's support for eastern Libyan forces, including Khalifa Haftar, has been a source of strain amid Libya's conflict. A 2014 hostage crisis involving Jordan's ambassador ended in a prisoner exchange, showing some scope for bilateral negotiation but also the insecurity affecting relations. Libya's political division makes the scope and continuity of government-to-government engagement uncertain.

Areas of tension

Key developments

Major uncertainties

Choose another pair