Relationship dossier

Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan

Relationship assessment

Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan ties have warmed through border agreements and renewed cross-border cooperation, while shared-water and boundary issues remain sensitive.

Kyrgyzstan toward Uzbekistan

+35

Kyrgyzstan negotiated border arrangements with Uzbekistan, including the 2021 agreement on delimitation and the 2022 arrangement concerning the Kempir-Abad reservoir. These steps represent substantive cooperation, although the reservoir agreement became a contentious issue within Kyrgyzstan.

Uzbekistan toward Kyrgyzstan

+40

Uzbekistan reopened border crossings with Kyrgyzstan as relations warmed from 2017 and participated in the 2021 border delimitation agreement and 2022 Kempir-Abad reservoir arrangement. These actions supported greater cross-border access and cooperation, while shared-water management remained sensitive.

Overall relationship

+40

The enduring relationship combines a history of difficult border and access questions with a marked period of rapprochement. Border delimitation, reopened crossings and shared-water arrangements provide a substantive basis for cooperation, but implementation and the political sensitivity of water and boundary issues temper the partnership.

How to read these scores

Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.

−100
Extreme sustained hostility
−50
Substantially adversarial
0
Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
+50
Substantially cooperative
+100
Exceptionally close sustained partnership

“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.

Relationship context

Knowledge coverageStrong

Overview

Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan have moved from recurring border and access disputes toward closer government cooperation. Border agreements and arrangements concerning the Kempir-Abad/Andijan reservoir were important steps, alongside the reopening of crossings and expanded travel and economic links. The relationship remains shaped by sensitive questions of border demarcation and shared water management.

Areas of tension

Key developments

Major uncertainties

Choose another pair