Relationship dossier

Montenegro United States

Relationship assessment

NATO allies with sustained U.S. support for Montenegro’s security and Euro-Atlantic integration

Montenegro toward United States

+55

Montenegro joined NATO in 2017 and has aligned with U.S. and allied policy, including sanctions against Russia. These actions reflect substantive security and policy cooperation with the United States.

United States toward Montenegro

+65

The United States recognized Montenegro’s independence in 2006, supported its NATO accession, and has provided security and other assistance. This has contributed to Montenegro’s Euro-Atlantic integration and bilateral cooperation.

Overall relationship

+60

The relationship is structured by Montenegro’s NATO membership and sustained U.S. support for its security and Euro-Atlantic integration. Montenegro’s alignment with U.S. and allied policies reinforces cooperation. The partnership is substantial, although the scope of bilateral programs beyond these areas is less clear.

How to read these scores

Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.

−100
Extreme sustained hostility
−50
Substantially adversarial
0
Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
+50
Substantially cooperative
+100
Exceptionally close sustained partnership

“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.

Relationship context

Knowledge coverageStrong

Overview

Montenegro and the United States have a close security relationship anchored in Montenegro’s NATO membership. Montenegro has aligned with major U.S. and allied policies, including sanctions against Russia, while the United States supported Montenegro’s independence and NATO accession and provides security and other assistance. The relationship is cooperative, though the extent and implementation of specific bilateral programs are not fully clear.

Key developments

Major uncertainties

Choose another pair