Relationship dossier

Myanmar North Korea

Relationship assessment

Myanmar–North Korea ties have included restored diplomacy and reported military cooperation, with the scope of security links unclear.

Myanmar toward North Korea

+30

Myanmar restored diplomatic relations with North Korea in 2007 and, under military rule, developed military contacts with Pyongyang. Reports of arms-related cooperation indicate security engagement, though its scope and continuity are unclear.

North Korea toward Myanmar

+30

North Korea restored diplomatic relations with Myanmar in 2007 and engaged in military contacts with its military government. Reports of arms-related cooperation suggest practical security ties, but the extent of North Korean support is unclear.

Overall relationship

+25

The relationship combines restored diplomatic ties with reported military and arms-related engagement, particularly under Myanmar’s military government. The 1983 rupture and later restoration mark a substantial change in the relationship, while uncertainty about the scope and continuity of security cooperation limits the case for describing it as a close or comprehensive partnership.

How to read these scores

Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.

−100
Extreme sustained hostility
−50
Substantially adversarial
0
Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
+50
Substantially cooperative
+100
Exceptionally close sustained partnership

“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.

Relationship context

Knowledge coverageLimited

Overview

Myanmar and North Korea restored diplomatic relations in 2007 after Myanmar severed them following the 1983 Rangoon bombing. Under Myanmar’s military government, the countries developed military contacts, and reports of arms-related cooperation have raised concerns about sanctions compliance. The scope and continuity of that cooperation remain unclear, so the relationship is best characterized as selective, security-focused engagement rather than a broad partnership.

Key developments

Major uncertainties

Choose another pair