Relationship dossier
Palestine
Tajikistan
Relationship assessment
Diplomatic engagement and Tajik support for Palestinian statehood underpin cooperative ties
Palestine toward Tajikistan
+20Mahmoud Abbas's 2011 visit to Tajikistan and the signing of bilateral cooperation agreements reflect Palestinian diplomatic engagement and concrete cooperation with the Tajik government.
Tajikistan toward Palestine
+35Tajikistan has supported Palestinian statehood in international forums and maintained diplomatic engagement with Palestinian leaders, including during Mahmoud Abbas's 2011 visit.
Overall relationship
+25The relationship combines diplomatic engagement and bilateral cooperation agreements with Tajikistan's support for Palestinian statehood. These features indicate a cooperative structure, though the breadth and practical effects of bilateral cooperation are unclear.
How to read these scores
Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.
- −100
- Extreme sustained hostility
- −50
- Substantially adversarial
- 0
- Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
- +50
- Substantially cooperative
- +100
- Exceptionally close sustained partnership
“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.
Relationship context
Overview
Palestinian-Tajik relations are characterized by diplomatic engagement and Tajikistan's support for Palestinian statehood. Mahmoud Abbas visited Tajikistan in 2011, and the two sides signed bilateral cooperation agreements. Tajikistan has also supported Palestinian claims to statehood in international forums. The relationship appears cooperative, although the scope and implementation of bilateral cooperation are not clear.
Key developments
Mahmoud Abbas visited Tajikistan, and the two sides signed bilateral cooperation agreements.
Major uncertainties
- The scope and implementation of the bilateral cooperation agreements are unclear.
- Details of ongoing government-to-government cooperation are limited.