Relationship dossier

Saudi Arabia Sweden

Relationship assessment

Commercial ties alongside a record of sharp diplomatic friction over human rights and defense cooperation

Saudi Arabia toward Sweden

-25

Saudi Arabia recalled its ambassador to Sweden in 2015 during a diplomatic dispute over Swedish criticism of Saudi Arabia’s human-rights record. The episode marked a concrete deterioration in Saudi government relations with Sweden.

Sweden toward Saudi Arabia

-25

In 2015, Sweden ended its military cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia amid disagreement over human rights and Saudi Arabia’s response to Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallström’s criticism. This was a concrete Swedish policy decision that strained bilateral relations.

Overall relationship

-20

The relationship has sustained commercial connections but is not characterized by a close political or defense partnership. The 2015 dispute, including Sweden’s termination of military cooperation and Saudi Arabia’s ambassadorial recall, represents a significant episode of bilateral friction.

How to read these scores

Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.

−100
Extreme sustained hostility
−50
Substantially adversarial
0
Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
+50
Substantially cooperative
+100
Exceptionally close sustained partnership

“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.

Relationship context

Knowledge coverageLimited

Overview

Saudi-Swedish relations have included commercial engagement but have also faced a major diplomatic dispute over Sweden’s criticism of Saudi Arabia’s human-rights record. In 2015, Sweden ended its military cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia, while Saudi Arabia recalled its ambassador amid the dispute. The episode shows recurring political friction alongside continued bilateral ties.

Areas of tension

Key developments

Major uncertainties

Choose another pair