Relationship dossier
Senegal
Uganda
Relationship assessment
Bilateral cooperation includes agreements on agriculture, tourism and information and communications technology
Senegal toward Uganda
+20Senegal engaged Uganda at a high level and concluded bilateral cooperation agreements covering areas including agriculture, tourism and information and communications technology.
Uganda toward Senegal
+20Uganda engaged Senegal at a high level and concluded bilateral cooperation agreements covering areas including agriculture, tourism and information and communications technology.
Overall relationship
+20The relationship has a cooperative foundation in high-level engagement and bilateral agreements in several practical sectors. The known arrangements indicate moderate cooperation, while their scope and implementation are unclear.
How to read these scores
Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.
- −100
- Extreme sustained hostility
- −50
- Substantially adversarial
- 0
- Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
- +50
- Substantially cooperative
- +100
- Exceptionally close sustained partnership
“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.
Relationship context
Overview
Senegal and Uganda have pursued bilateral cooperation through high-level engagement and agreements in areas including agriculture, tourism and information and communications technology. The known cooperation supports a positive but moderate assessment; the scope and implementation of these arrangements are unclear.
Key developments
Senegalese-Ugandan high-level engagement included bilateral agreements in areas such as agriculture, tourism and information and communications technology.
Major uncertainties
- The scope and implementation of bilateral cooperation agreements are unclear.
- The extent of ongoing government-to-government engagement is uncertain.