Relationship dossier

Senegal United Kingdom

Relationship assessment

A constructive partnership encompassing development, education and security cooperation

Senegal toward United Kingdom

+25

Senegal engages the United Kingdom through bilateral consultations and cooperation in areas including development and security. The scope of specific Senegalese government initiatives toward the UK is not fully clear.

United Kingdom toward Senegal

+35

The United Kingdom has provided development assistance to Senegal and pursued bilateral cooperation on security and education, supporting a continuing but not exceptionally close partnership.

Overall relationship

+30

The relationship is characterized by practical cooperation, particularly through UK development assistance and bilateral engagement on security and education. These links provide a cooperative foundation, although the scale and durability of specific programmes are less clear than in a close strategic alliance.

How to read these scores

Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.

−100
Extreme sustained hostility
−50
Substantially adversarial
0
Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
+50
Substantially cooperative
+100
Exceptionally close sustained partnership

“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.

Relationship context

Knowledge coverageLimited

Overview

Senegal and the United Kingdom maintain a cooperative bilateral relationship, with development, education, security and trade among its areas of engagement. The United Kingdom has supported Senegal through development assistance and security cooperation, while Senegal has engaged with the UK through bilateral and Commonwealth-related channels. The relationship appears constructive, though the scope and continuity of specific government programmes are not fully clear.

Key developments

Major uncertainties

Choose another pair