Relationship dossier
Georgia
Venezuela
Relationship assessment
Venezuela’s recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia is a central source of friction with Georgia.
Georgia toward Venezuela
-25Georgia condemned Venezuela’s recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, which Georgia regards as part of its territory.
Venezuela toward Georgia
-40Venezuela recognized Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states in 2009, challenging Georgia’s territorial claims.
Overall relationship
-30The relationship is shaped by a direct sovereignty dispute: Venezuela’s recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia conflicts with Georgia’s territorial claims and drew Georgian condemnation. The scale of bilateral cooperation outside this issue is unclear.
How to read these scores
Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.
- −100
- Extreme sustained hostility
- −50
- Substantially adversarial
- 0
- Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
- +50
- Substantially cooperative
- +100
- Exceptionally close sustained partnership
“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.
Relationship context
Overview
Relations are marked by Venezuela’s 2009 recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, territories Georgia considers part of its sovereign territory. Georgia condemned that recognition. The dispute is a significant source of bilateral friction; the scope of other government-to-government engagement is unclear.
Areas of tension
- Venezuela’s recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia conflicts with Georgia’s territorial claims.
Key developments
Venezuela recognized Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states.
Major uncertainties
- The scope of direct bilateral engagement beyond the dispute over Abkhazia and South Ossetia is unclear.
- The extent of any subsequent change in either government's approach to the bilateral dispute is unclear.