Relationship dossier

Kazakhstan Turkmenistan

Relationship assessment

Practical cooperation on border arrangements, Caspian Sea issues and regional transport

Kazakhstan toward Turkmenistan

+35

Kazakhstan has cooperated with Turkmenistan on bilateral border arrangements and regional transport, including the Kazakhstan–Turkmenistan–Iran railway project. It has also worked with Turkmenistan on the Caspian Sea legal framework.

Turkmenistan toward Kazakhstan

+35

Turkmenistan has cooperated with Kazakhstan on bilateral border arrangements and regional transport, including the Kazakhstan–Turkmenistan–Iran railway project. It has also worked with Kazakhstan on the Caspian Sea legal framework.

Overall relationship

+40

The relationship is underpinned by practical cooperation on border arrangements, regional transport and Caspian Sea governance. These areas support a durable cooperative relationship, although the scale and implementation of some arrangements remain uncertain.

How to read these scores

Scores are rough judgments, not objective measurements or current verification. Directional scores describe government policy and conduct, not public opinion. The overall score is an independent estimate, never an average.

−100
Extreme sustained hostility
−50
Substantially adversarial
0
Mixed or neutral, supported by knowledge
+50
Substantially cooperative
+100
Exceptionally close sustained partnership

“Not assessed” means there is no recorded score. Pair existence makes no claim about diplomatic recognition or established relations.

Relationship context

Knowledge coverageStrong

Overview

Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan have pursued practical cooperation on border arrangements, Caspian Sea issues and regional transport. Their bilateral border agreements and participation in the Kazakhstan–Turkmenistan–Iran railway project reflect sustained government cooperation, alongside joint work on the legal framework for the Caspian Sea. The relationship is cooperative, though the scope and implementation of some initiatives are not clear.

Key developments

Major uncertainties

Choose another pair